Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Final Project

GoogleDoc Matrix


                I chose my lesson plan from my inclusion class last semester. It is about teaching students in grades four through six how to play the recorder. At first, it seemed like a challenge to integrate technology into learning to play an instrument. It was a challenge, but I believe the technologies I chose will greatly benefit the students not only to learn the recorder, but to learn other musical devices.
                The first row discusses the items we will have learned before picking up the recorder that are necessary to play it. These are basic musical foundations needed for any instrument or basic musical training. While we are reviewing these items, we can integrate technology by using online sites that allow us to practice our knowledge. I enjoy MusicTheory.net because it allows one to quiz themselves (with both written and aural examples) based on a specific unit of study. It also allows you to change the difficulty of the exercises for different level learners, something that is virtually impossible in the classroom without this technology. Imagine trying to give each student a different, fair assessment without wasting an immense amount of time and energy. NETS 1C applies here because it concerns using models to explore specific issues. MusicTheory.net allows the students to practice at their own pace and the teacher can arrange quizzes, so this can be a student activity, or teacher-guided.
                The second row concerns using a variety of instruments to learn musical nuisances, and also playing alone or with other students. I did not include a NETS standard in this group because it is irrelevant, although a variety of technologies can be used to learn some of the same things. The only way for this standard to be accomplished is though playing an instrument, in this lesson, the recorder.
                The next column is very important, as it discusses imitating and improvising melodies or patterns. The NETS standard of communicating ideas to an audience is directly correlated with the improvisation standard. It is also very possible to integrate technology effectively here. The traditional way to do these activities would be for a teacher to play a melody or pattern, which a student then copies, or the teacher playing backgrounds while the student has to improvise over them. With new technology, however, we can hear a melody on music notation software, such as Finale, and have the students repeat it. We can even have them practice this at home by sending them the Finale file and having them decipher it. SmartMusic is another fantastic way of monitoring practice at home. This program can tell the student when they are playing notes incorrectly, which would be invaluable when trying to figure out a melody by ear. Lastly, ImproVisor is a great website with ideas and a program on how to improvise. The program allows students to play a solo over a chord change played beneath them. It also allows for a solo to be automatically written, for the beginning soloist who does not know what to do during an improv section).
                The next column takes the playing from ear and puts a visual aspect to it: reading sheet music. Hopefully by this point, the students will know their clefs and how to read music, but it is still very possible that they will not, or that they will struggle with it. Melodies and patterns will still be played, but from written music this time. They will need to use their ears and eyes to follow the pattern of the music on the board. This is a teacher/student activity, because it is based around the students but needs a teacher to mediate and help out. I picked SmartMusic for this section because of its previously described ability to tell a student when they are playing notes incorrectly. In this case, it will even show them which notes are wrong.
                The next column discussing Orff instruments is similar to the second column, discussing the proper use of basic instruments. The recorder will be displayed by both the teacher and YouTube videos. If the teacher can find something intriguing on YouTube for their students, the students will be more willing to play enthusiastically.
                The last column shows the playing of actual melodies and songs, in AB or ABA patterns. These are very common patterns which the students need to know. As NETS states, preexisting knowledge will form the basis of this section of the lesson. This group activity with guided practice allows for the culmination of everything the students have been working on. SmartMusic is again a fantastic device. This will be the culmination of our short lesson or group of lessons, as we will be playing a full song on the recorder.
                Overall, the addition of technology to this lesson plan was greatly beneficial and not nearly as difficult as I first thought it would be. As long as it benefits and interests my students, I would be willing to try any of these technologies or other suggestions for the good of my students.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Musical Robots

This article describes just one of the many ways music and technology are becoming more integrated every day:
Georgia Tech Article

In summary, their Director of Music Technology has created a robot that can not only play music, but improvise, playing WITH live humans. It can listen to a human player and copy and respond to their style, timbre, dynamics, etc. It began as a drummer (drum set) but has been reprogrammed to play xylophone as well.

I like the article's quote "The project is also designed to shed light on humans' cognitive and physical ability to enjoy and create music. This is one of the most unique human traits that has not been explained by science as of yet." We discuss things like this all the time in music classes: how music is so emotive and can represent such feelings, the other advantages it provides outside of music. But why? What physically makes the brain respond this way. Perhaps this project is a step into the right direction to figuring this out.

A new model of the robot will delve further into exploring the relationship between musicians (or in this case a robot and a musician) and how they interact in performance.

Other than this being a fascinating project, I am interested in what it means for music education. Is it good or bad? On one hand, we could one day model things for our students using a robot; the robot can accompany students while they are practicing (such as during improv for jazz). We can also use this robot as a cross-curricular project with science classes, either analyzing it or perhaps even building one. On the other hand, relying too much on this robot can be detrimental. Also, the robot technically cannot think; it has algorithms programmed into it that allow it to create a randomly generated response. At some point, these were the thoughts of a person, not completely created from nothing.

Regardless of how we view this development, this is a whole new step and extremely interesting.